NIST RMF & FISMA Support
Support system categorization, control selection and tailoring, implementation statements, assessment preparation, authorization packages, and ongoing authorization activities using NIST SP 800-37 and 800-53.
RadialByte helps organizations interpret applicable security requirements, assess control implementation, prepare assessment documentation, and resolve compliance gaps across federal and commercial frameworks.
Organizations must demonstrate not only that security controls are documented, but that they are implemented, assigned to responsible owners, and supported by current evidence. Gaps in system boundaries, control narratives, inheritance, testing records, and remediation tracking can delay assessments and complicate audit responses.
RadialByte reviews requirements against actual control practices, identifies missing or inconsistent evidence, and helps control owners prepare traceable documentation and corrective actions.
Our work is scoped to the frameworks, system boundaries, control responsibilities, and assessment milestones that apply to your organization.
Support system categorization, control selection and tailoring, implementation statements, assessment preparation, authorization packages, and ongoing authorization activities using NIST SP 800-37 and 800-53.
Review cloud service boundaries, control responsibilities, implementation narratives, required artifacts, and evidence gaps against the applicable FedRAMP baseline and authorization pathway.
Assess applicable contractor security requirements, document control implementation gaps, review CUI protection practices, and develop prioritized remediation plans for assessment readiness.
Map policies, technical settings, procedures, and operational records to selected control requirements; document deficiencies, evidence limitations, and corrective actions.
Develop or refine System Security Plans, control matrices, evidence inventories, risk assessment documentation, and Plans of Action and Milestones with owners and target dates.
Coordinate evidence requests, track assessment findings, maintain compliance calendars, review recurring control evidence, and report the status of outstanding remediation commitments.
Deliverables are selected according to the applicable framework, assessment scope, and maturity of existing compliance artifacts.
We align the compliance workplan to the assessment boundary, applicable control set, evidence requirements, and target review dates.
Confirm the framework, system boundary, data types, inherited controls, stakeholders, and assessment schedule.
Examine implementation narratives, policies, configurations, procedures, and available evidence against control requirements.
Assign findings, update documentation, establish remediation milestones, and collect evidence of corrective actions.
Organize assessment artifacts, support assessor requests, and establish recurring evidence and POA&M reviews.
Practical considerations when preparing for a framework assessment, audit, or authorization review.
Yes. We can support security categorization, control documentation, SSP and assessment artifact development, POA&M preparation, and continuous-monitoring planning. The Authorizing Official retains the authorization decision.
We review the relevant framework, system boundary, information types, contractual requirements, and inherited controls to develop an applicability and responsibility mapping for review by your designated stakeholders.
No. We can work with your current GRC system, evidence repository, spreadsheets, and ticketing workflows, provided they support the required documentation, ownership, and audit trail.
Yes. We provide advisory readiness reviews, control gap documentation, evidence preparation, and remediation planning. Independent assessments and certification decisions remain with authorized assessment bodies.
We help document each finding, identify the affected requirement and owner, define corrective actions and milestones, collect closure evidence, and report overdue items and residual risks for management review.
Share the framework, assessment timeline, and documentation gaps you are addressing. We can discuss a focused compliance advisory engagement.